What should be done when addressing a minor nonconformity?

When addressing a minor nonconformity, recognizing that a follow-up audit may not be necessary is a key aspect of the audit process. Minor nonconformities are typically less severe and may not significantly impact the overall functioning or effectiveness of the management system.

In such cases, organizations often have the authority to address these nonconformities through corrective actions that do not necessitate an immediate follow-up audit. The decision to not perform a follow-up audit acknowledges that while the issue should still be addressed, it does not pose a risk to the overall compliance with the ISO/IEC 27001 standards. This approach allows organizations to prioritize resources effectively, ensuring that more critical areas receive attention while still maintaining a commitment to continuous improvement and compliance.

The other options involve actions that either escalate the response unnecessarily or fail to recognize the nature of a minor nonconformity. Documenting and closing immediately is essential, but a follow-up audit might be considered excessive for minor issues. Ignoring a minor nonconformity is counterproductive, as even small issues can accumulate if not managed properly. Lastly, requiring immediate corrective action is more aligned with major nonconformities, where the impact could be significant, thus not appropriate for minor instances.