An organization has decided to move its information-processing facilities to a place where the risk of flooding is low. What option of risk treatment is this?

The choice of relocating information-processing facilities to a location with a low risk of flooding is classified as risk avoidance. This option involves taking proactive measures to eliminate or significantly reduce the exposure to specific risks when possible. By changing the location of the facilities, the organization is effectively removing the flood risk as a concern for its operations.

Risk avoidance is one of the strategies outlined in risk treatment plans and aims to protect critical assets by ensuring that they are not subjected to potential threats or vulnerabilities that can cause harm to the organization. In this case, the organization's decision demonstrates a strategic effort to safeguard its information assets by eliminating the risk of flooding altogether through relocation.

Other strategies, such as risk evaluation, typically involve assessing the risks and their potential impacts rather than taking direct action to remove them. Risk sharing involves distributing the risk among different parties, such as through insurance or outsourcing, while risk acceptance means acknowledging the risk and choosing not to take action, typically when the costs outweigh the benefits of mitigation. Each of these options serves different purposes in risk management, but the organization's decision to move facilities aligns most clearly with the goal of risk avoidance.